MQTT is one of the most widely adopted protocols today in the IoT Arena. There are a lot of MQTT Brokers available for your solution implementation. Choosing the MQTT Broker that fits your criteria makes your project more than 50% complete. Developers should evaluate and lay out distinct quality aspects of MQTT brokers to make a right choice. In an article earlier this year, we wrote about How to choose a perfect MQTT broker for your implementation. Bevywise MQTTRoute is a commercial MQTT Broker built using C and python. Similarly, Mosquitto is one of the fastest open source broker built on C. This article gives a high level overview of the MQTT Broker comparison between MQTTRoute and Mosquitto.
Both Mosquitto and Bevywise are built as per MQTT protocol specification like publish message format, command messages, QoS(Quality of Service), retain, Wild card topics and error handling etc.
Security of a MQTT broker is largely determined by the user configuration and only to a lesser extent by the broker’s security features. These include authentication and authorization mechanisms, as well as encryption support. In that case both MQTT Brokers support high level device authentication & TLS/SSL MQTT security.
MQTT Data Persistence
IOT / IIoT is not about communication. It is about storing data for future analysis and decision-making. Mosquitto by default process all the message communication in memory. There is an option to store data of subscription into a file (mosquitto.db). But this file cannot be used outside the application. However, MQTTRoute comes with a default option to store data into MySQL, SQLite & PostgreSQL. We recommend MySQL for deployments and the application you are building can also query the database in parallel. In addition MQTTRoute allows you to write data into ElasticSearch, MongoDB or any other storage using the plugin system built into the MQTT Broker.
One of the critical issue in the MQTT Implementation today is that the manager applications are built over data received by an MQTT client that subscribe to #. But, this is not the right as the meta information of the data is lost. So this mandates the need for the MQTT Broker to be integral part of the application. Keeping this in mind, we have built the UI into the MQTT Broker. We have built a comprehensive MQTT Dashboard as part of the MQTTRoute as well as the Platform. Also, MQTTRoute supports creating multiple dashboards with some pre-built widgets intended to provide better visualization of data. However, Mosquitto does not have any User interface as the data persistence itself is not available. There are some third party User interfaces which are built as a client.
Above all, The default web interface of the MQTTRoute can be customized as needed. The Product can be white labelled. Mosquitto as a open source MQTT broker can be customized to a larger extent. But the customization is more on the C layer for the Mosquitto and all the building blocks over it need to be recreated. Bevywise MQTTRoute on the other hand allows customization at the appliation layer. Some of the customization includes changing the User interface, advanced visualization transforming data before storage,
Data Hooks, REST API and ML/AI Integration are the three major integration end points of the Bevywise MQTT broker. MQTTRoute makes a huge leap ahead when you want to build an application over the Mosquitto. With the support of AI/ML integration you can add a ML algorithm into MQTTRoute to automate your machine learning process. Other than REST API’s, Bevywise MQTT broker can be customizable to integrate with other MQTT based tools like Google pub/sub, Redis, tableau, modbus and more. Besides that, the cost and the effort spent on customization will be very minimal when compared to Mosquitto.
MQTT Broker Performance Comparison
Performance of MQTT Broker depends on two main metrics one is the maximum sustainable throughput and the other is the average latency. The first metric is the maximum sustainable throughput at which the MQTT Broker is able to process all communicated messages. In terms of sustainability, Mosquitto is built on C and Bevywise MQTTRoute is built on a combination of C & Python for easy extendability and performance. Mosquitto is the fastest MQTT Broker available today when run as just a message broker. Bevywise MQTTRoute has a throughput at par with the Mosquitto.
The next one is the average latency from publisher to subscriber in a given scenario. Short latencies are important for many IoT applications, where live monitoring of data is desired. In terms of latency, both has a has lower latency/message delivery time across all QOSes. And also, MQTTRoute has the exposure of better latency (less round the trip time) than Mosquitto in QOS 0. To know more on MQTT Broker performance, have a look at the performance comparison study done by University of Szeged, Hungary.
Support & Consulting
MQTTRoute comes with a FREE Support where in we do consluting for your implementation while you will not be getting these supports on the Open Source Brokers. We also provide FREE community support for FREE users. Read more about our support policy.
MQTT Broker comparison Table
MQTT, Web socket
Visualize of Data
In built Dashboard with details of Devices level. Manage devices with send command, create Rules via UI.
thrid party plugin
device level Authentication
TLS / SSL ,
device level authentication
Inbuilt Storage Options
MySQL / SQLite / PostgreSQL
Allows Third-party application to read.
Store data in-memory & File
Only for Internal purpose
Extendable data Storage
Extension based Storage using Custom_storage option. Prebuilt connectors available in Github.
third party plugins for Storage
Windows, Windows server, Linux, Mac and Raspberry Pi
Linux, Mac, Windows and BSD
YES. Custom Rules can be added from the User Interface.
YES. Time Out errors , Authentication, Packet errors are deducted and shown on the UI.
Yes, Enabled at the conf file and show in the Terminal
Yes. Option to customize to any language
No. One used as a single cluster
Yes. IoT Platform supports SaaS based Scalable architecture
Developed and will be available soon
Complete MQTT Standard Support
REST API , Data Plugins
Only DATA Plugins
C / Python language
Current support MQTT 3.1.1 and MQTT 5 coming soon
Current support MQTT 3.1.1 and MQTT 5 coming soon
24×7 live support via Telephone, Whattsapp, Email.
The overall MQTT Broker comparison between MQTTRoute & Mosquitto will help you choose the best one for your IoT implementation.
You can try the Bevywise MQTTRoute by downloading it FREE now.
Must Read Other Related Post
- Docker MQTT Broker for easy service manageability
- Choosing Best MQTT Broker for your IoT Implementation Lower Power consumption
- MQTT vs REST from IoT Implementation perspective
- Creating SSL Certificates for Secure MQTT communication
- MQTT Broker integration using REST API
Feel free to write to support for any questions / suggestions.